Boycott Spec

THE PAPER IS SUPPOSED TO WATCH COLUMBIA

Who watches the University?

Spec is not pushing Columbia hard enough.

A watchdog cannot run on press releases.

The campaign asks whether Columbia too often gets to define the headline, the first quote, and the limits of the story.

The demand is simple: investigate powerful people, verify what the Office of Public Affairs says, talk to people affected by University decisions, and return when promises come due.

ChatGPT found a more administration-favoring frame in the selected spring 2026 metadata.

ChatGPT scored 56 headlines, public descriptions or ledes, and available excerpts.

Average target-level framing score−1 is critical of administration; 0 is neutral or mixed; +1 is favorable or strongly administration-centered.
April–May 2024 baselinen=21
-0.095
April–August 2026n=35
+0.143
Change: +0.238
Read the accessible data table
PeriodAverage scoreSample
April 29–May 15, 2024-0.09521
April 1–August 10, 2026+0.14335
Difference+0.23856 records total

Open every input, score, and rationale in Excel

Do the work power hopes nobody will do.

Investigate

Start with documents, affected people, money, and decision-makers—not the University statement.

Interrogate

Ask who benefits, what evidence is missing, and which claims remain unverified.

Follow up

Track deadlines, reforms, investigations, trustees’ decisions, and promises to survivors.